Scott Ross Claims That James Safechuck Was a Nonentity Have Been Debunked

Ever since Dan Reed's Leaving Neverland was released back in March, Jackson truthers have been putting in more overtime than Vladimir Putin's misinformation troll factory.

After James Safechuck states in the documentary that Jackson telephoned him and asked him to testify on his behalf, only to refuse, which led to Jackson becoming angry, this was quickly questioned and allegedly debunked by a guy named Scott Ross.

Charles Thomson Makes Glaring Factual Inaccuracies regarding the Neverland Train Station and James Safechuck's Timeframe of Abuse

I'll be honest, I'm not that familiar with Charles Thomson. Sure, I've heard his name many times, and there's no doubt he's a Michael Jackson truther, and all-round obsessive fan.

The 30+ something year old "journalist" is popular within the I support unrelated man/boy sleepover community, and if you doubt Jackson's innocence on social media or forums, there's no doubt you'll eventually be spammed with one of his videos, or articles.

Why Is Harrison Funk, Jackson's Former Photographer Playing Dumb over His Neverland Train Station Claims?

It's taken a while, but British tabloids are finally reporting on Harrison Funk's claims that the Neverland train station was built before a planning permit was issued.

In a February 2019 podcast, Harrison Funk confidently claims that Jackson explicitly told him not to take any photographs of the train station not once but twice, because it hadn't received its planning permit. Funk even claims that Jackson didn't want to tell him over the phone, in case anybody, including the local authorities were listening in.

Mike Smallcombe Claims He's Found Discrepancies in Dan Reed's Leaving Neverland, but Has He?

It appears that Michael Jackson's, hate filled loonies have a new Messiah in Mike Smallcombe. Smallcombe, a tabloid journalist from Newquay, Cornwall, released a pro–Jackson book titled: "Making Michael" back in 2016, and presumably sees nothing wrong with unrelated  grown men enticing unrelated children into their private quarters and bed.

Smallcombe claims to have discovered holes in the recent Leaving Neverland documentary directed by Dan Reed, and its subjects, Wade Robson, James Safechuck and their families.

This, unsurprisingly, has led to Jackson truthers frantically quoting his "findings" through social media, forums, and pretty much anywhere else, you'll find them.

But what exactly has Smallcombe allegedly uncovered, and is it truthful, or a one-sided misinformation campaign intended to create the usual doubt, confusion as well as hatred towards Jackson's accusers?

Facts Don't Lie. People Do

Facts don't lie. People do. That's the slogan of, yet another Michael Jackson fan website, specifically designed to pour doubt and confusion over the allegations made by Wade Robson and James Safechuck, and the makers of Leaving Neverland.

Despite the "MJInnocent Team" behind this website claiming they "wholeheartedly support victims of all types of abuse, including child sex abuse", they started their campaign well before the documentary was even aired, and have even secured funding to display ads promoting their controversial campaign across a small amount of London transport buses.

But does the MJInnocent Team really care about victims or the truth, or are they just another bunch of dysfunctional celebrity worshippers on yet another victim shaming campaign.

Below I will take a look at what they have written on their website, and whether it has any real truth. All the screenshots are from with my response below each one. If you're viewing this site on a mobile device, you can tap on each image to enlarge it. Deluded Open Letter to Transport for London, a website specifically designed to pour doubt and confusion over the allegations made by Wade Robson and James Safechuck against Michael Jackson appeared on a number of London buses earlier this month (March 2019) before receiving widespread condemnation from the public and Survivors Trust, a charity that supports victims of child sex abuse.

The ads, which used the slogan," Facts Don't Lie. People Do." was later removed. was created by a Northern Irish man, and former Big Brother contestant Seany O'Kane, who funded the campaign with a page.

The biggest problem with, which I highlighted in a lengthy post, is that the website contains very little facts, instead tries to discredit Wade and James through a malicious misinformation campaign, which isn't just shameful towards them, but all victims of child sex abuse.

After analysing I sent email to the owner, calling their website a blatant misinformation campaign and asked them to back up their "facts". I only got one reply back, which didn't answer any of my questions. I have since sent two emails and one tweet which have gone completely unanswered by the owner.

The Voice Online Is Promoting the Misinformation and Hate Website

The Voice Online, self-proclaimed Britain's favourite black newspaper, is now promoting, a misinformation website designed to create doubt, confusion and hatred towards Wade Robson and James Safechuck., which is run by a Northern Irish man, and former Big Brother contestant, Seany O'Kane.

The website and slogan "Facts Don't Lie. People Do." was recently seen across London buses, before being removed after severe criticism from the Survivors Trust, which supports victims of rape and child sexual abuse, said the adverts were "really inappropriate" and called for Transport for London (TfL) to take them down.

Seany O'Kane wrote on his Twitter account: "Dear all, I am excited to announce that from Thur 21st March, our campaign #MJINNOCENT will be advertised on the FRONT PAGE of the UKs 'Voice' newspaper."

Michael Jackson Had Semen Stains from Other Males on His Bed

During the 2005 investigation, it was revealed that the investigators found the DNA of other males on Jackson's bed, in the form of semen.

The seaman did not belong to Gavin or Star Arvizo. However, it could have come from other boys, as Jackson was known to befriend multiple young boys at the same time, while keeping them apart from each other. If not, it strongly suggests that Jackson was having sexual encounters with other men, something he always denied.

The official court document reads as followed:
DNA of Anyone other than Mr. Jackson
There are two DNA reports in this case.
The first DNA report says 3 male DNAs were found on Mr. Jackson's mattress. Of these 3 males, one was identified as Mr. Jackson. aka "male 1." The remaining 2 males were not identified. However, the report says that these 2 males are not the alleged victims in this case, i.e., Gavin Arvizo and Star Arvizo.
The second DNA report says a fourth male DNA was found in bed sheets. The bed sheets presumably were found in a laundry bag, along with underwear. The fourth male is unknown, but is not the alleged victim, i.e., Gavin Arvizo or Star Arvizo.
These DNA reports have no relevance to any of the charged crimes, particularly the alleged molestation, in this case. There is no nexus between Mr. Jackson's DNA and the alleged crime.

Yes, Jordan Chandler Did Accurately Describe Michael Jackson's Splotchy Penis

This is something that sends Jackson truthers into complete meltdown. You've probably read many articles claiming that Jordan Chandler didn't accurately describe distinctive markings on Michael Jackson's penis, or that any match only existed in the head of Thomas Sneddon.

What's the truth?

Well we can say for certain that Jordan did under police supervision, make a drawing of Jackson's penis, and where one or more markings were located.

This was then compared to photographs that were taken of Jackson's genitalia after the police obtained a search warrant for a strip search.

Wade Robson Perfectly Explains Why He Defended Michael Jackson in 2005

In an interview given to the Victoria Derbyshire show, Wade Robson and James Safechuck give a very emotional interview detailing the horrific sexual abuse they received at the hands of Jackson.

Wade, who defended Jackson in his 2005 criminal trial is universally seen as a liar and perjurer by Jackson apologists.

However, Wade perfectly explains why he falsely denied being abused by Jackson, both as a kid and as a adult in the interview.

Wade explains from day one that Jackson trained him on how to lie, how he made him feel like he was his best and only friend, and impressed on him that nobody could find out what they were doing unless there would both end up in jail.

He details on how Jackson would call him every day after the 93 allegations and prepare him on what to say when the police came knocking.

As an adult, Wade said he was terrified that people would find out what he and Jackson had been doing, because Jackson had made him believe he was complicit in the sexual activities, that he wanted it just as much as Jackson did. Wade was also about to get married at the time and didn't want such sordid details being revealed to his soon-to-be wife.

If you think long and hard about it Wade was really stuck between a rock and a hard place. If didn't defend Jackson in 2005, or through interviews after, but instead disappeared off the face of this earth and gave no comment whatsoever, that in and of itself is an admission that something went on, something he felt very uncomfortable with. If he feels he was complicit in the sexual activities, something that had been hardwired into his head from such a young age by Jackson, then, yes, of course, he's going to defend him, not because it's right but because he doesn't want the world or his family to know what really went on.

It was a similar case with Brett Barnes, somebody who spent 400 nights in bed with Jackson. Rather than give a convincing testimony that his relationship with Jackson was completely innocent, he was more concerned that people may view him as being "gay".

Ron Zonen, a prosecutor in the 2005 trial who has tried many sex-abuse cases, recently said he understands why Wade and Jimmy have now come out years later, because victims disclose abuse on their terms, not necessary when you need them.

Yes, it can be hard to believe that somebody would actually defend their abuser, especially as adult. But the reality is, it does happen and it's called the Offender-Victim Bond, as documented in Child Molesters:A Behavioral Analysis.

You can watch the 24 minute interview in full at the following link: